Lichess ratings are significantly easier to get/hold in my experience. Ratings are all just relative, so maybe lichess just attracts more casual players. Also due to lichess's entry level being 1500 if you are around that rating you will be playing more new players, and could be winning some easy games more often.lichess - actual infinite analysis made by free engine for free, actual premoves. chesscom - analysis are total trash that even 1800 elo moves are often missed because of 15 depth which is like 0,05 seconds of thinking (still by the same free engine btw, so you pay for using free engine analysis of your game, you can simply download it btw, so this is more or …People here are saying it's just a mistake on Lichess' part, but they already cover this in their Fair Play section. Using a chess engine in a game against a bot is explicitly prohibited. Using any assistance during a bot game is against the rules. And the rules do not make any distinction between a casual or rated game.The only things chess.com premium has done for is getting me commited to chess since I have paid for it. Everything they have is provided for free but I paid for the subscription because it helps me stay commited without being a lacky I have improved a lot since I started chess 4 months ago thanks to solving over 2000 tactics puzzle due to me ...There seems to be a consensus that the player pool on Chess.com is #1 stronger, and that #2 the ratings on Lichess are super inflated. What I'm confused about is the fact that Chess.com says that in Blitz my percentile rank is 64.1%. My rating is around 1024. On Lichess percentile rank is most commonly about 44% as of the last few months.My son has a chesskids.com ranking of 1000, and we made a deal that if he reached rank 800 on chess.com, he'd get a reward. He says he prefers chesskids.com because he thinks there's a lot of cheaters on chess.com. I believe he's making an excuse as far as the chess.com cheaters are concerned. Likely, if he were better, he'd probably rank up ...Again I agree that Lichess is better. Just pointing out that you can see best moves for free on chess.com. For me it's much easier to analyze with the best five moves already drawn as arrows and that's only possible in lichess. To understand a position on chess.com quickly you have to be very good at chess notation.It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.Also, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess > chess.com. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment [deleted] • Additional comment actions. Lichess is better because it ...Advertising on Reddit can be a great way to reach a large, engaged audience. With millions of active users and page views per month, Reddit is one of the more popular websites for discussions online. It’s also an incredibly powerful platfor...I like chess.com but their server is crap. Lichess has a better, cleaner more user friendly layout and I’ve never had any issues with their servers, so for this reason I use lichess. As far as the difference in numerical ranking goes: just pay attention to percentile, it gives you a better idea of where you’re at.Chesstempo has a very huge library and they also do something similar to Lichess where they make tactics puzzles based on games played on their server. Correction: chesstempo uses master games, not games played on their server. Subjectively, the feel of the problems is quite different from Lichess problems.A while ago, the common opinion on Reddit was that the quality of Chess Tempo puzzles were higher than those on Lichess. Lichess updated their puzzles a few months ago. Has puzzle quality improved? This thread is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 2. Chess Board game Tabletop games. 6 comments.Really sucks losing 20 points on a tactic after solving 5 for 4 points each but i like that they're untimed. Lichess tactics are quite simple I have found. I've been playing chess for 2 months and I'm 2075 rating. I would think my chess rating was 1000-1200.I like chess.com but their server is crap. Lichess has a better, cleaner more user friendly layout and I’ve never had any issues with their servers, so for this reason I use lichess. As far as the difference in numerical ranking goes: just pay attention to percentile, it gives you a better idea of where you’re at.Dgt has recently released a much more affordable unit with plastic pieces and fast input time. The chessbrahs use it on stream. With this more affordable and durable board maybe getting this as an option in lichess would benefit a bigger set of players than before. I asked chess.com if they would eventually support a dgt board. The answer was no.While in lichess, you can only change the speed of the piece animation. VARIANTS: Chess.com - Chess.com has more variants. Including my favorite, bughouse. CHATTING: Lichess.org - Lichess has notifications on when your friends message you, and it's just easier to talk on there. Two of the most popular chess websites are chess.com and lichess.org.Its not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.This is perhaps less true now that Lichess has the "Insights" feature, but there may still be something to this. Scid will let you keep a personal database on your own computer, while Lichess stores all data on it's own servers. If something terrible happened to Lichess, everything on there would be gone, while you'd still have your database.Typically yes the lichess rating is 150-200 pts more than many sites (not just chess.com) However in your case I just feel you haven't played enough rated games or have been consistently playing opponents that both better and higher rated than youView community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. LiChess vs Chess.com . I’m a long time LiChess player and have a blitz rating of about 1600. I’ve recently started playing on chess.com too but I can’t seem to get above 1000-1050. Has ... Lichess vs Chess.com style of play.Let's look at the data: After e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 the most common move on lichess is Bc4 with 12.4million occurences, the second most common move is Bb5 with 8.3million occurences, so actually the Italian is more played on Lichess as well, nearly 50% more often than the Ruy Lopez. I don't think chess.com has a general opening explorer, so I can't ...Make one accidentally and you're stuck with it if it's legal. On lichess you just tap the board and it cancels. Not to say that chess.com is strictly worse when it comes to that but as someone who plays a ton of chess on mobile that was one major reason for why I switched to lichess long ago.So grosso modo the ranking difference between lichess and chess dot com is about 400 points. It's more like 200-300 points unless you're very low rated. The higher rated you are, the smaller the difference is. It's almost exactly 300 point difference at lichess 1200, but then at 2300 it's exactly 200 points.Many users prefer Lichess's UI and UX to Chess.com's. There are also philosophical differences between the two sites: Lichess is ad free and subsists on donations, while Chess.com is a profit-over-everything-else business. People don't typically like paywalls for features when free alternatives exist. Furthermore, there are cultural differences ...My First Year of Chess. m.imgur. 88. 72. r/chessbeginners. Join. • 2 yr. ago. If you can accurately guess my ranking or my opponents ranking you get an award! (Inside 100 points or closest guess within 24 hours)Some of that 93% also play on lichess, but a mere 5% of your survey respondants only play on lichess (compared to over half that only play on chess.com). If you are looking for reasons why people prefer one to the other, I think you really want the views of the people who only play on one site if you can get them. 8.No , quite frankly I wouldn't recommend it. It isn't bad, but overall it is just a big puzzle book. There is a e.g. a section which I find the idea really nice. It shows you positions of one of your uploaded games and you have to find the right move. If you do: good, if you don't it only shows the best move.950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Best. Cabernet2H2O • 2 yr. ago. You don't need a chess.com membership. Everything and more is out there for free. But if you can afford it, won't really miss the money and actually use it and enjoy it, it's worth it. I really don't get these questions. You can get a free trail, or pay for a month, to decide for your self.Chess Assist is lightweight and packed with all new features! Calculate the best move, get live score data, and adjust your engine rating all with on-screen visuals. Custom made and lightning fast, this extension carries full support for Lichess.org, ChessArena.com, and Immortal.game!The puzzle difficulty seems to increase too slow though. Probably still needs some tweaking. That was intentional. Around 50% of Lichess userbase is rated under 1500, and it's not much fun when you can't get past a score of 10. Puzzle Storm is a feature for everybody on Lichess, and not only for high rated players.Lichess inflation. Most people agree that lichess ratings are inflated by around 300-ish points. I moved to lichess from chess.com a while ago for better analysis and prep, and have gotten considerably stronger since then. I'm around 1900 lichess rapid. I'd assumed this equated to 1500-1600 chess.com.Lichess is more crooked and weird in some ways. More cheaters. And it has a LOT of annoying features: so hard to 0-0 in 960, whereas it's so easy on chess.com, also you lose if you flag with insufficient material, like bishop king vs pawn king. Totally nuts.Not saying chess.com is hugely better necessarily, but defaulting the win to Lichess because of price is ridiculous. My take on the difference is: I like Lichess for the Study feature, and the opening explorer filtered certain rating ranges is very convenient (checking a couple quick lines is a lot smoother than battling with Chessbase).In the interest of understanding the commonly noted chasm between users' lichess Ratings and their respective chess.com Ratings, I devised a conversion formula between the two. I went to lichess' Weekly Rating Distribution page and roughly calculated the mean and standard deviation for Classical, Blitz and Bullet time controls.I'm a 1380 bullet player in chess.com, which is around 95% percentile and on lichess I'm rated 1700, which is around 67% percentile. This is a huge difference and obviously I'm an excellent player in chess.com players pool and little above average in lichess players pool. I played over 3000 games in both and play on the same level.Lichess is much better for live chess. But I think lichess should consider adding regular Swiss tournaments, without the co-co-combo breaker points and without rewarding fast players (ie., make them with regular rounds in the tournament). Lichess tournaments are fun and fast, but chess.com tournaments feel more «serious».Lichess study engine is strongest. Lichess game engine is second. Then chess com game engine. The in tab stockfish boosted is the strongest but not worth waiting too long for stockfish to pick which move it likes the most. I had the lichess engines be more critical of my games and call more errors than the chess com did on the same gamesLichess new Opening explorer feature is absolutely superb :) 478. 54. r/chess. Join. • 12 days ago.It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.A 12th-century fritware chess set from Nishapur, Iran. Missing just one black pawn, it is one of the oldest nearly complete chess sets ever discovered. 2.2K. 74. r/chess. Join. • 1 day ago. "SinisterMagnus" has NOT been replaced by a GM named WiniVidiVici on chess.com, as these accounts are entirely separate.I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.I play on Lichess, and I'm looking for a comparison tool to estimate approximate fide/uscf ratings. This table is the best I've found so far. However, it's dated to 2016. Whenever I see people asking a similar question on this and other chess forums, the anecdotal evidence says that lichess classical rankings have undergone even further inflation since the 2016 …It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.Hey, everyone, got this mate on accident earlier. Still pretty new to chess (been playing on and off for about a year now) and I’ve been exclusively playing on Chess.com. Rated ~600 in rapid but have been really enjoying 3 min blitz games recently (rated 200-300). Since I joined this sub I’ve seen a lot of mentions of Lichess.Lichess is much better for live chess. But I think lichess should consider adding regular Swiss tournaments, without the co-co-combo breaker points and without rewarding fast players (ie., make them with regular rounds in the tournament). Lichess tournaments are fun and fast, but chess.com tournaments feel more «serious».There are many people joining the “chess.com versus lichess.org” debate on the various discussion forums. These are some of the most informative ones: Reddit: …At "lower" levels (<1800 lichess / <1600 chess.com) there is a huge difference between the ratings. At those levels lichess is just much higher than chess.com rating. But at relatively high levels ratings start to be more or less equal. E.g. 2300 on lichess is around ~2250 chess.com as far as I know.I believe that the consensus is that chess.com 's paid for features are better than lichess's free features, but lichess is free and not that much different. 7788445511220011 • 2 yr. ago. I'd also maybe suggest that lichess has been improving in areas that were lacking, with things like themed puzzles, puzzle rush, indicators for blunder etc ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. How good is the cheating detection at Chess.com vs Lichess? Am a casual so would prefer to use the site that has a better/superior cheating detection system. I had accounts for both sites but don't want have the willpower to figure out if the player is cheating.Chess.com has more features and is more aesthetically pleasing, While Lichess is more barebones and has less features than chess.com. Lichess is FREE and has more features than the free version of Chess.com. Chess.com lets you have all its features with its subscriptions which range from $50-120 per year.Hey, everyone, got this mate on accident earlier. Still pretty new to chess (been playing on and off for about a year now) and I’ve been exclusively playing on Chess.com. Rated ~600 in rapid but have been really enjoying 3 min blitz games recently (rated 200-300). Since I joined this sub I’ve seen a lot of mentions of Lichess.GM Peter Svidler analyzes the epic endgame between Anand and Carlsen: "This is the most study like endgame I have seen in a proper game of chess in a long time. It is like fairytale stuff I am struggling to believe". 447. 32. r/chess.Chess.com vs Lichess. There seems to be a fair amount of jerks on chess.com i.e trolling, taunting, stalling etc. That’s usually the app where I play. I’ve used Lichess a few times and my opponents seem to be nicer. Quick to chat, offer a take back when I blunder, a small sample size. There is no "true" rating. They are two different systems: a person 1.8 meters tall is also 5.9 feet tall. (besides, different chess rating systems don't really measure how good you are, but how well you played a series of specific games against specific opponents) 10. Soveliss72 • 1 min. ago. Please don't use decimals with imperial units. ascpl.The difference between lichess and chess.com. Difference between making money versus open source. One is an actual business, the other is volunteer based. Pros and cons to each. I don't particularly like chess com but it actually brings people in to chess and makes it money. The WC for example lichess didn't have an excellent commentary team ...It will also make you think you are awesome at chess. My rating on lichess is like 500 elo higher than chess.vo. or chess24, which are much closer in rating. So it's more fun to play on lichess and beat 1800s that it is to play on chess.com and get destroyed by 1400's. After playing some rapid games on both platforms, my rating on lichess is 2024 and my rating on chess.com is 1919. However, with these ratings i'm in the top 6.9% on lichess and top 0.3% on chess.com. This is a huge difference considering I should be relatively close to where the ratings converge. The 0.3th percentile on lichess is at around ...At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ...Many people prefer lichess due to the variety of options it offers, and also because it's open source and ad-free. Chess.com got a big advantage by claiming the website name early. I personally use chess.com, I'm just used to it and I think it looks cleaner. If you just wanna play chess, it pretty much doesn't matter, but for good options ...They help you identify these tactics in your games and put them to use. I have had lichess puzzles where I'm equal in material and I'm still equal in material at the end but my position is much better. As a person who tries to calculate out the line before moving, I find these puzzles are basically impossible to do.Chessdotcom and Danny Rensch say that he was auto-banned and later exonerated after manual review. I think this shows that their system prefers false positive classifications because clearly Alireza wasn't cheating. I don't see how that's a controversial opinion. -2.Also, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. MeglioMorto • 7 mo. ago. Marginally simpler approach: from chess.com, on your browser, click on the address bar and type "lichess.org" follower by enter. On the contrary, from lichess: on your browser, click on the address bar and type "chess.com" follower by enter. WingCommando • 7 mo. ago. I guess you and 36 others miss the point entirely.Again I agree that Lichess is better. Just pointing out that you can see best moves for free on chess.com. For me it's much easier to analyze with the best five moves already drawn as arrows and that's only possible in lichess. To understand a position on chess.com quickly you have to be very good at chess notation.Maia is a human-like neural network chess engine. This version was trained by learning from over 10 million Lichess games between 1100s. Maia Chess is an ongoing research project aiming to make a more human-friendly, useful, and fun chess AI. For more information go to maiachess.com. You can also play against @maia5 and @maia9.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ... Its not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.In my experience with enough practice you can learn to predict certain types of mistakes in a player which is a skill you can learn from playing the engine. Also as a final note, the ratings on those "bots" on chess.com are so clearly inflated to boost people's egos. So many sub 900s posting they "beat the 1500 bot".There’s more to life than what meets the eye. Nobody knows exactly what happens after you die, but there are a lot of theories. On Reddit, people shared supposed past-life memories that made them believe reincarnation could be possible. Do ...Chess.com vs Lichess.org - The ultimate comparison 1. Interface and Design: - Chess.com has a polished and professional interface, with various themes, cosmetics, and customizations available for premium members. - Lichess.org offers a cleaner and simpler design known for its minimalism, and all customizations are available for free. 2. Cost: That my lichess blitz is way lower than it “should” be (I really blow at blitz, and most people on Lichess with an equal-ish classical rating have a much higher blitz rating, I’ve noticed) and 2. that my USCF rating is a bit low (which I suspected previously because I play relatively well against people ~300-400pts higher than me both OTB and at clubs, these …There is not inflatory about it and by always trying to compare lichess ratings to chess.com ratings you are pretending like the chess.com ratings are "true" or "correct", when actually it is the lichess ratings that use a more sophisticated rating system (Glicko-2) - chess.com used to use Glicko-1, but then ~2 years ago they removed RD from ...Lichess is just a better layout and chess.com seems to have more cheaters on it. Chess.com also wants money for legit everything including tactics, and chess.com is more American than worldy. Lichess has the anonymous option for when you want a quick consequence less challenge, and you end up playing people all over the planet.That makes a huge difference. That means a score of 2100 on lichess is "1.4 times better than average" (which is an oversimplification of how Elo is really calculated and what it represents) whereas a score of 1800 of chesscom is "1.5 times better than average", which is a very minor difference. Share.Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago.On desktop computer, the only answer is both, chesscom isn't buggy at all there. com for better pieces and board styles, premoves, news and forums, 960 tourneys. lichess for all other tourneys, unlimited analysis, unlimited puzzles, and a great 3D wooden set to practice OTB. [deleted] • 3 yr. ago.TIL about the Mikhail Chigorin Club - A list of players who defeated the reigning World Champion in a classical game. 266. 73. r/chess. Join. • 5 days ago. Nervous to play in-person. Would like some direction. 396.It may be as simple as: C.c is on a mission to commercialize chess for profit, whereas Lichess is on a mission to make chess free and ad-free. So these are 2 entirely different business models. Instead of paying C.c, I donate a small amount to Lichess each month to support their costs. Yeah. Chess.com is for profit and Lichess mission is to ...950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz. 2. DopazOnYouTubeDotCom • 9 mo. ago. Finally, somewhere I can rant about how bad chess.com is /j. 39. FatherOfFunko • 9 mo. ago. I used to play Chess.com a lot, but then moved to Lichess and never looked back. It has everything for free and infinite puzzles, which I like. So I would recommend it over Chess.com. 62.I threw together a quick and dirty (and ugly) chart because I was curious: Lichess vs Chess.com blitz ratings. Basically, Lichess doesn't report ratings under 800 (and they only have 8 people at that level) but that is already the 25th percentile for chess.com. 1850 is 90th percentile for Chess.com but only 73rd percentile for Lichess. 2250 Lichess is 97.5 percentile, and 97.5 percentile on ...The names of all of the chess pieces are the pawn, knight, bishop, rook, queen and king. There are more pawns compared to any other pieces, 16 pawns total, with eight for each player.It's not exact for all the ratings, for exemple, some Grandmasters are 3000 or over on chess.com or lichess, and 2700 FIDE (because they can play rated games more often on chess.com and RD are not the same). The difference of ratings is also due to the fact that the average rating on lichess is 1500 and chess.com is 1000.I'm wondering if there is a known relationship between ratings on chesstempo and lichess. In my case, I'm rated 1400 in chesstempo blitz tactics, and 1300 in lichess blitz. I believe both sites have ratings which are centered at 1500. In my case, does the higher rating on chesstempo likely mean that tactics are not my major weakness at the moment?View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com vs Lichess computer games - relative strengths. It seems to me that on my mobile phone the Chess.com computer opponent plays at a much higher level than the Lichess computer opponent of the same rating. Has anyone noticed this or is this in my head?Lichess has a better engine and it’s free. They both have the same variants, tournaments, and puzzles too. Chess.com has more variants, though they're not implemented particularly well. For most people, the difference between a depth 20 and depth 15 engine don't really matter that much.Lichess vs chess com reddit, how many weeks until new year, kda all out meet
Lichess vs Chess.com style of play. Does anyone find that the style of chess is different between the two platforms? I know the ranking is different, as my score is about +400 on lichess, but I also find the style of play is different too. Chess.com seems more reserved to me.. Lichess vs chess com reddit
naked pokimainThe percentile is calculated differently, our better formulated the term activate chess player is. 'All' streamers play on chess.com because they think it is the best website they have have a reward program. So newer players who watch a video on YT will likely more go to chess.com and they will stick there. Because of that, newer player friends ...Cheating is absolutely rife on lichess. Amongst the lower rated players, 1200 to 1600. The amount of times I've won major pieces in the first 10-15 moves and the guy is clueless, then all of a sudden they come back with moves that match stockfish move for move 100% and 'win'. There's a pattern too, they take exactly the same amount of time per ...Coming from someone whos played thousands of of games on chess.com and hundreds on lichess (2 different accounts per website) lichess is more casual, and is free. They offer free lessons and tactics. With chess.com the player base is bigger, they offer much more efficient and a wide variety of learning tools. Lichess has three neutral net bots trained on games done by actual players at rating level 1100 (Maia1), 1500 (Maia5) and 1900 (Maia9). They're still a little weird but it's much easier to believe they're humans with quirks and are probably better training than the regular chess bots. There's no easy comparison.The adding of time for streaks on lichess is very good because it rewards streaks compared to raw mouse speed on chess.com. However, chess.com offers puzzles that increase in difficulty quicker, leading to a better challenge and probably a better version for higher rated players. Lichess on the other hand is more rewarding to the lower rated ...Lichess is superior due to the far greater amount of functions compared to chess.com's free version. Everything is free on lichess and I like the interface better. The only thing I will say is that I like that chess.com supports Swiss tournaments, which lichess does not (arena tournaments stress me out, and I don't like streaks or Berserk).This website has a very handy chart for comparison that I use. On both sites you're above median by about 200 points. Weirdly enough my rapid rating on Lichess is 100 higher than yours, but 300 higher on Chess.com. A conversion chart I found would put 1800 at 1450 on Chess.com, so I think we're both probably a bit underrated on Chess.com.They are quite comprehensive, and done well. I STOPED my subscription after 3 months because it was just not worth the money. Here is why: Youtube has strong chess videos for free. The quality of instruction is comparable. Chess.com is much more organized, but the organization is not worth 14$ a month (or 99 a year).Lichess is about 370-400 points higher than chess.com. To me, its due to their rating formula using a higher initial rating than chess.com. They have a superiority complex where they think people will face more similar skill if they raise all the ratings up with their glicko-2 rating system (chess.com apparently uses a glicko-1 rating system), …But I don't see the purpose of this. As I play chess at work (I am an accountant) when I don't want to work, and the tab does tell you whose turn it is. My tabs either say "waiting for opponent" and "your turn". I use Microsoft Edge and Lichess. Currently I have it open on the opening explorer and it says "Analysis board * lichess.org".I believe that the consensus is that chess.com 's paid for features are better than lichess's free features, but lichess is free and not that much different. 7788445511220011 • 2 yr. ago. I'd also maybe suggest that lichess has been improving in areas that were lacking, with things like themed puzzles, puzzle rush, indicators for blunder etc ... View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com Vs Lichess. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment HowBen • Additional comment actions ...Last week I posted a post about making a wooden cat themed chess set and today the first Queen completed the sample. 1 / 7. 1.9K. 76. r/chessbeginners. Join. • 12 days ago. a month playing and 150 elo.I'm 1700 classical on lichess, and 1600 on chess.com, 1900 blitz and 1700 on chess.com, and 2100 bullet and 2050 on chess.com. I personally feel like chess.com has weaker opposition: perhaps because it's more mainstream, it's the first result for "online chess". It probably attracts casuals and patzers.A while ago, the common opinion on Reddit was that the quality of Chess Tempo puzzles were higher than those on Lichess. Lichess updated their puzzles a few months ago. Has puzzle quality improved? This thread is archived. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. 2. Chess Board game Tabletop games. 6 comments.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com Vs Lichess. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment HowBen • Additional comment actions ...Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app.You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ... Chess.com and lichess use different rating systems, and give different ratings to new players. Chess.com ratings end up being consistently lower, but that doesn't correspond to you being in a lower percentile of players on chess.com (what parent was talking about). For reference though, I'm 2000 lichess rapid, and 1700 chess.com rapid.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ...1. Beautiful-Iron-2 • Above 2000 Elo • 7 mo. ago. This seems really low tbh. It differs a lot more than I think people like to admit. My chess.com rapid is usually the same as OTB, blitz is usually lower than OTB. Lichess is usually +300 for me. 3. JimemySWE • 1600-1800 Elo • 7 mo. ago.Can someone explain to me how the ratings on Lichess vs Chess.com are so different. I primarily play on Chess.com and, after seeing another post here about Lichess decided to give them another try. In bullet I sit between 700-800 on Chess.com but just dominated some guy who was 1400 on there. This seems crazy?View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com Vs Lichess. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment HowBen • Additional comment actions ...At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ...The best thing about daily chess (online correspondence-like) is you will play book lines even if you’re both less experienced, because opening book is allowed. Thus you get a chance to learn proper theory in game. You won’t be playing long book lines in lower level short time formats. 8.After playing some rapid games on both platforms, my rating on lichess is 2024 and my rating on chess.com is 1919. However, with these ratings i'm in the top 6.9% on lichess and top 0.3% on chess.com. This is a huge difference considering I should be relatively close to where the ratings converge. The 0.3th percentile on lichess is at around ...So e.g. level five is listed as 2000 rating. It lists the estimated Elo next to the username when you play a particular computer opponent. Stockfish level 2 is listed as 1100, level 3 I believe is 1400. Honestly, your post is surprising, because I'm a slightly higher ELO than you against humans (~1100), yet I can barely ever beat stockfish 3.The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more! The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed.Elo-based rating systems measure win ratios within a pool of players - that's it. (If anything, lichess ratings are more accurate than FIDE, as they use glicko2 instead of the old pure Elo rating system). Not at all. You can never compare ratings across systems, but particularly with lichess. A 1500 on lichess is likely somewhere in the 1000 ...The only thing chess24 has is the video library of GM instructions like Peter Svidler's 10 to 12 hours on the Grunfeld Defense. Graphics is good on chess.com as I hope Lichess gets to offer those piece set designs at some point. Chess24 has recently unveiled an improved graphics upgrade similar to Lichess but they don't offer the Spatial or ...At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ... It's actually 3 times as many people play rapid than blitz on chess.com, 28 mil vs about 10 mil. 10+0 is the most popular time format by far. With that said both pools have an average rating around 800. So for the OP I'd just guess that they're better at longer time formats.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com Vs Lichess. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment HowBen • Additional comment actions ...Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...So around 300 points difference. Above 1600 Lichess, and the story flips, with players generally keeping up with 1300-1500 on chessdotcom. But it is mostly because of different playing styles, when you finally learn how to play simple chess (1700+ on either side) then the playing styles become very similar.Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community. I am a low rated player of about 1600 on lichess and 1350 on Chess.com. In order to improve my game recently, I decided to use one of the amazing plug-ins mentioned in one of the posts a couple of weeks ago. The results on chess.com were amazing.The difference at that level is the starting point. The fact that Lichess starts at 1500 and Chess.com at 800, means that if you're around 1100 at Chess.com you're meeting people that gained 300 elo, if you meet people around 1500 at Lichess you can meet many new users (usually they have a question mark on the rating).For context, I'm 2000 on Lichess puzzles and 1400 on ChessTempo. I'm finding the ChessTempo puzzles to be much more realistic. For whatever reason, Lichess puzzles seem to rely on forced moves and mate threats to find a solution while the ChessTempo puzzles include much quieter moves, including defensive moves and drawing positions.Two significant updates later brings this new overhaul to the Lichess puzzle system, and I'm genuinely pleased with the breadth at all levels and the solutions to the harder puzzles. The motifs are not only there in puzzles, but compared to chess.com, they're categorized prior to player feedback.in my experience on chess.com and lichess, good cheaters run another instance of the game on their cell phone or browser tab, or whatever, but not just following engine moves: they play themselves until the eval bar gets too far out of their favor or very in their favor, then they start using the engine moves to get out of the hole they are in ...My thoughts: Lichess is very functional, but also very ugly (super subjective) (EDIT: I play almost exclusively on mobile apps) For some reason, the super inflated ratings bother me. They are entirely detached from reality. Chess.com is obviously inflated relative to USCF or FIDE, but not nearly as bad. Lower then lichess. The people in the chess.com rating pool are not the same people as in the Lichess rating pool. There’s no reason to think differences in averages would be anything but kind of random. The people are different but there are still roughly the same type of players. The huge difference suggests we are missing something here. Why lichess is better than chess.com: rating system glicko 2 vs glicko 1. In Lichess there are a lot less rating distortions as there are in chess.com . better interface. Better app. anti-lag. In Lichess, they focus on giving a fair experience to the players, so they have implemented the anti-lag system, which divides the lag among the players.Yes, chess.com ratings are much lower than Lichess ratings. There's not really any reason they should be the same besides convenience, and making them equivalent would be difficult. They are two different measurements. Comparing Lichess rating to Chess.com rating is like comparing inches to centimeters.Lichess tries to set its average rating to 1500; chess.com generally sets its to 800. However, Lichess generally has a stronger pool of players, so the rating difference works out to typically be about 400, not 700. If I had one Elo point for every time this question gets asked, engines would never stand a chance.Hi everyone - I know online chess ratings, particularly at lower time controls, are somewhat apples and oranges when compared to ELO. However I am wondering whether someone could estimate my FIDE rating based on my Lichess rating - I am 2150+ in bullet, blitz, and rapid (unrated in classic).I know on lichess and chess.com the elo levels are not distributed at the same skill level, with what I've seen being lichess is around 400 points or so inflated compared to chess.com. However, after around a month and a half playing and sitting comfortably at 1050 or so on chess.com, I'm struggling on lichess to break past 1200.Lichess uses SF14 in the analysis and chess.com uses SF15.1 which rates higher, so should be better for most none book positions, but probably the respective allocation of computer resources is more relevant. But for tablebased positions Lichess gives Syzygy DTZ50 figures as well as Nalimov DTM figures, so is correct (though it still won't ...It makes a lot of sense, since Lichess ratings don't go below 600. So necessarily a sub 600 chess.com would still be at least 600 on Lichess (and the average difference is just smaller of course) The gap gets much smaller the higher your rating gets. I'm Lichess about 2000 & Chess.com about 1900.Lichess is excellent and currently chess.com has been having major server overloads for a couple weeks, so easy choice. Learn to use the analysis functions, there's tutorials online, it's easy to learn and do. If you want an app, I'd suggest going to lichess.org and in your browser menu (not the lichess menu) click Install App or whatever it is ...My rapid rating is 1950. On chess.com my bullet and blitz and rapid are all between 1450 and 1500. Chess.com uses glicko version one and Lichess uses glicko version 2. On Chess.com your starting rating depend on what you select when you sign up. (I think there are 4 starting ratings; 800, 1200, 1800 and 2000). On lichess you start with 1500.1. Beautiful-Iron-2 • Above 2000 Elo • 7 mo. ago. This seems really low tbh. It differs a lot more than I think people like to admit. My chess.com rapid is usually the same as OTB, blitz is usually lower than OTB. Lichess is usually +300 for me. 3. JimemySWE • 1600-1800 Elo • 7 mo. ago.Is lichess overall accuracy worse than chess.com? So a while back I used the game review feature on chess.com and it gave me an average accuracy of around 80 something while lichess gave me an accuracy of over 93. Just now I used the lichess analysis and it gave me an average score of 95 when I made 2 inaccuracies.Lichess is free and open source, the UI is much better, you are able to do custom pairings and choose who you will play, create your own tournaments, free tactics, free opening explorer and database (powerful and even more useful), free engine and game analysis, lichess studies which are an amazing way to save your analysis, etc.Best. FICS is great for live play and also has some fun variants. Chess com has live too but is nice for turns based. CC has daily puzzles and tactics etc if into that sort of thing and has a bit more of a social media feel with user profiles. Fics has many different client apps which provide varied experiences and abilities.The chess.com puzzles have kinda bizarre ratings , they don't make much sense until you get over 2000 . Some of the ones rated 400 or even lower can have a trick to it, and many of the ones between about 1400-1900 are "do this aggressive looking move and the problem ends", where it is actually quite a lot of work to correctly calculate that that is the best move.Both are incredibly inferior to Chesstempo IMO. I'm almost 3K on Chess.com which is a joke given my actual strength -- their all time standings are a good indication of how broken their tactics trainer is (65K is their "global all time" rating) . The real difference though is the comment section -- I actually learn from the comment section on Chesstempo -- they discuss variations and things ...There seems to be a consensus that the player pool on Chess.com is #1 stronger, and that #2 the ratings on Lichess are super inflated. What I'm confused about is the fact that Chess.com says that in Blitz my percentile rank is 64.1%. My rating is around 1024. On Lichess percentile rank is most commonly about 44% as of the last few months. You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ...950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Many people prefer lichess due to the variety of options it offers, and also because it's open source and ad-free. Chess.com got a big advantage by claiming the website name early. I personally use chess.com, I'm just used to it and I think it looks cleaner. If you just wanna play chess, it pretty much doesn't matter, but for good options ...Many users prefer Lichess's UI and UX to Chess.com's. There are also philosophical differences between the two sites: Lichess is ad free and subsists on donations, while Chess.com is a profit-over-everything-else business. People don't typically like paywalls for features when free alternatives exist. Furthermore, there are cultural differences ...Lichess is much better for live chess. But I think lichess should consider adding regular Swiss tournaments, without the co-co-combo breaker points and without rewarding fast players (ie., make them with regular rounds in the tournament). Lichess tournaments are fun and fast, but chess.com tournaments feel more «serious».What this means varies though - chess.com has a huge player base, so 50th percentile there will incorporate an awful lot of casual players and dead accounts etc - whereas lichess for example, has a smaller playerbase, …Its not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.Hi everyone - I know online chess ratings, particularly at lower time controls, are somewhat apples and oranges when compared to ELO. However I am wondering whether someone could estimate my FIDE rating based on my Lichess rating - I am 2150+ in bullet, blitz, and rapid (unrated in classic).in my experience on chess.com and lichess, good cheaters run another instance of the game on their cell phone or browser tab, or whatever, but not just following engine moves: they play themselves until the eval bar gets too far out of their favor or very in their favor, then they start using the engine moves to get out of the hole they are in ...As someone who plays puzzles more than chess (daily and sometimes for hours) Lichess has signficantly poorer puzzles. Very obvious forks at 2500 lichess level, simple doubling, pinned pieces. Chess d com has some really obscure stuff at the 2800 level which running through an engine shows depth. I know chess d com bad but for puzzles not so much.2. The largest problem with sites like LiChess and Chess.com is that the standard pools are not very reflective of Over The Board rating. Most people play chess online for the Blitz and Lightning games. Chess.com recently came out with some statistics that showed that their Blitz rating pool is roughly the same as USCF currently.I prefer lichess because it's essentially chess.com in most ways, but free. There's probably a few things that chess.com has that lichess doesn't, but 99% of the important features (game review style analysis, puzzles, account metrics, etc) are definitely there and don't require a membership. [deleted] • 9 hr. ago.. 2014 rav4 blue book value, frye splatoon rule 34