Chess.com uses the Glicko-1 algorithm with an initial rating of 1200. Lichess uses the Glicko-2 algorithm with an initial rating of 1500. Neither of them uses the Elo algorithm ( not ELO - it's not an abbreviation). Furthermore, it doesn't make sense to compare the ratings even if both sites used the same system, as they have different player ...As someone who plays puzzles more than chess (daily and sometimes for hours) Lichess has signficantly poorer puzzles. Very obvious forks at 2500 lichess level, simple doubling, pinned pieces. Chess d com has some really obscure stuff at the 2800 level which running through an engine shows depth. I know chess d com bad but for puzzles not so much. Lichess uses the better model (defined by how accurate it predicts results). In a nutshell Lichess will be higher until rating 2100 or so. After that Lichess will be lower than chess.com. It doesn't use a better model, apparently, after a few games, you get 1 point for a win, 0 for a draw, and -1 for a loss.Lichess is 1000 years ahead in technology. For Lichess, the pawns on b7 and g7 look like cute little mice, so I'm gonna have to go with Lichess. Lichess is better but Chess. com has copious amounts of cash. Obv. chess.c*m is better as lichess' arrows have little gaps as shown above.Elo-based rating systems measure win ratios within a pool of players - that's it. (If anything, lichess ratings are more accurate than FIDE, as they use glicko2 instead of the old pure Elo rating system). Not at all. You can never compare ratings across systems, but particularly with lichess. A 1500 on lichess is likely somewhere in the 1000 ...Lichess assigns 1500 as a provisional rating for new players. I believe chess.com uses 1200 instead. As a result chess.com ratings are about 300 points lower than lichess ratings. That's a bit simplistic since everybody is provisional for a while and the rating jumps quite a lot according to that. There are some differences but in general ... I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really …There seems to be a consensus that the player pool on Chess.com is #1 stronger, and that #2 the ratings on Lichess are super inflated. What I'm confused about is the fact that Chess.com says that in Blitz my percentile rank is 64.1%. My rating is around 1024. On Lichess percentile rank is most commonly about 44% as of the last few months. I had the same effect when I switched from lichess to chess.com. the ease of reporting bad sports after each match seems to really curb much of the toxic chat found on lichess. Also the analysis after each game makes it really easy to pick out cheaters. Overall I have found chess.com to be immensely better than lichess.Lower then lichess. The people in the chess.com rating pool are not the same people as in the Lichess rating pool. There's no reason to think differences in averages would be anything but kind of random. The people are different but there are still roughly the same type of players. The huge difference suggests we are missing something here.I made the mistake of jumping straight into a super fast game in Lichess and made awful mistakes before resigning. I took some time to relearn my things, played against the computer, and did a Blitz game of 30 minutes on the Chess.com app and won it without much difficulty, raising me from the starting 800 to 900something.There's more people in the rapid pool meaning more points overall, and due to blitz being less enjoyable for a lot of newer players the blitz pool has fewer newer players making the caliber of player tilt higher. 2. kaperisk • 2 yr. ago. Same. Rapid is about 200 points higher than blitz. I don't play bullet on lichess.I actually started playing Chess thanks to Lichess' simplistic nature. I would just go to Lichess, press the big button "Play with Friend", choose a time control, accept and send them the link. It was so easy, that I started doing it more and more out of boredom and eventually starting to take Chess seriously.chess.com starting rating is a few hundred points lower than on lichess, so you can think of it like all the ratings are shifted slightly by that amount (this is only really true for lower levels where there are a lot of players, at higher levels chess.com ratings are super inflated).Chess com puzzles do seem to be more theoretical, while lichess ones feel more like they are taken out of actual games. But overall, I find that both tend to evaluate things on material counts (the 9 for queen, 5 for rook, etc.) rather than straight positional compositions. UnlawfulFoxy • 8 mo. ago.This website has a very handy chart for comparison that I use. On both sites you're above median by about 200 points. Weirdly enough my rapid rating on Lichess is 100 higher than yours, but 300 higher on Chess.com. A conversion chart I found would put 1800 at 1450 on Chess.com, so I think we're both probably a bit underrated on Chess.com. We use submitted data from 17,946 chess players to compare ratings across chess sites and organizations. We use submitted data from. 17,946.You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ... The major advantage of Lichess is the analysis is all free. While chessCom is limited 1 time a day and limited depth for free user. I also prefer Lichess since it has best move arrow before the move happens, while on chess Com you can only see the best move after you play a move. 18.On chess.com I have 1400-1500 ratings for blitz and rapid, but only 900 on bullet. I guess I'm just slow, and I never practice it. On correspondence there is a big discrepancy between players who take just a minute to move and ones who actually use an analysis board and 15-30 minutes to figure out what they think is best.The clinic where she is interned has lost the chess pieces so we have decided to model our own game in cold porcelain. Next Sunday on our next visit we have to paint the black pieces. MiscellaneousAlso, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.See my edit. I would say it's probably the latter, chess.com is #189 in Alexa internet ranking and lichess is #1,705. This means that if you are a begginer then you are most likely going to start with chess.com, skewing the player base lower than lichess, which may be harder for begginers to find. I was mandela effect-quantum swapped from a ...There is not inflatory about it and by always trying to compare lichess ratings to chess.com ratings you are pretending like the chess.com ratings are "true" or "correct", when actually it is the lichess ratings that use a more sophisticated rating system (Glicko-2) - chess.com used to use Glicko-1, but then ~2 years ago they removed RD from profiles, so possible …In the interest of understanding the commonly noted chasm between users' lichess Ratings and their respective chess.com Ratings, I devised a conversion formula between the two. I went to lichess' Weekly Rating Distribution page and roughly calculated the mean and standard deviation for Classical, Blitz and Bullet time controls.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Bullet on lichess vs chess.com . I got a new phone, iPhone 13 recently. For some reason when I play bullet on chess.com every move seems like it lags ever so slightly, which it doesn't do on lichess for me. I was playing in an arena last night on chess.com and I lost so ...Download Free Study Plans Lichess Rating vs. Chess.com Last Updated: 1/1/2023 How does your chess.com rating compare to your lichess.org rating? The data …I also agree that the chess.com lessons are good. Maybe I'll move that up in the article to emphasize it more. If you're going to be playing chess a lot (maybe daily) I think the ~10$ should be worth it, for a whole year. Not at lot of anything subscription-based costs $0.08/day anymore.It's much easier to understand. 1400 on lichess means that you approximately better than 30% of the use rbase. Now you can say, chess.com has stronger classical players so you would expect a rating below 30 percentile on chess.com which would be way below 1200, I think.Also you can make a chesscom account even with sites like fakemail, whereas on lichess you cant, you need a reputable site like gmail. Kamsky says lichess sucks because of his partnership with chess.com. Lichess recently updated their cheat detection system. this implies chesscom has the working detection system.On Lichess.org I hover around ~1350-1450 on Rapid 10+0 games, but on Chess.com I can't get past 1150. Are the rankings different? The level of players? Or because I've almost exclusively played on Lichess.org the past few years - I seldom play games in real life - that my brain isn't used to the board? Thanks!A chess set contains 32 pieces, 16 pieces for each player. Each player has one king, one queen, two rooks, two bishops, two knights and eight pawns. In a Staunton chess set, half of the pieces are white and the other half are black.Chess.com vs Lichess Ratings. It seems to me there is a discrepancy of at least 200 points in the corresponding ratings, perhaps even more. Or there are some various psychological and other reasons for me playing much better blitz at lichess than at chess.com. At chess.com any 1600 rated opponent is tough as a nut, will fight you tooth and nail ...The interface difference certainly affects gameplay, I play much worse on chess.com.There is no actual way to convert ratings because both use different rating systems and initial rating but in general chess.com rating lags behind lichess ratings till 2000~ and then they are pretty close mostly.As someone who plays puzzles more than chess (daily and sometimes for hours) Lichess has signficantly poorer puzzles. Very obvious forks at 2500 lichess level, simple doubling, pinned pieces. Chess d com has some really obscure stuff at the 2800 level which running through an engine shows depth. I know chess d com bad but for puzzles not so much.Chess.com vs lichess I'm a novice and was thinking of becoming a subscribing member to chess.com for the lessons and tactics. I understand chess.com has a nicely structured lesson plan but lichess seems to have everything a absolute beginner would need for free..Lichess forbids engine use in correspondence games. Using an engine is cheating, just using the board eg to analyze yourself and move pieces around isn't cheating I would say. It should be noted that the official rules of the governing body of correspondence chess (The ICCF - International Correspondence Chess Federation) allow engine use.Lichess is much better for live chess. But I think lichess should consider adding regular Swiss tournaments, without the co-co-combo breaker points and without rewarding fast players (ie., make them with regular rounds in the tournament). Lichess tournaments are fun and fast, but chess.com tournaments feel more «serious».Lichess Insights alternatives ? I'm kind of a beginner in chess (~1500 on lichess) and although I find the Lichess Insights feature interesting, I wonder if there are other ways to have a global analysis of all your (li)chess games? For example, knowing your win/lose rate given a certain position that might not have an ECO identification.Yes. I believe 100-200 points higher than USCF, at least 200 higher than chess.com last I played at chess.com (yes, I do think chess.com ratings are actually a bit lower than USCF for blitz anyway). CatalystoftheMind • 7 yr. ago. My lichess rating has always been significantly higher than my chess.com rating.Chess ratings are relative values, the number itself is completely meaningless, what matters is how your number compares to other players in the same player pool using the same rating system. You can compare ratings Lichess to Lichess or Chess.com to Chess.com for example, those numbers don't have any other meaning.Oh and the difference between chesscom and lichess is ~250-300, lichess being higher. Your chess.com rating is actually pretty high for 1000 on Lichess. Most Lichess 1000s are around 500 on chess.com. Yes totally normal. Lichess is around 300 points higher than chess.com for low ratings.Lichess is 1000 years ahead in technology. For Lichess, the pawns on b7 and g7 look like cute little mice, so I'm gonna have to go with Lichess. Lichess is better but Chess. com has copious amounts of cash. Obv. chess.c*m is better as lichess' arrows have little gaps as …Lichess has always started players at a rating of 1500, the recommendation of the Glicko system. For several years, chess.com started players at a rating of 1200, despite also using the Glicko system. This difference in their ratings has largely persisted, at higher or lower levels the difference in player strength on the two websites is about ...Lichess forbids engine use in correspondence games. Using an engine is cheating, just using the board eg to analyze yourself and move pieces around isn't cheating I would say. It should be noted that the official rules of the governing body of correspondence chess (The ICCF - International Correspondence Chess Federation) allow engine use.Chess.com tactics are a bit inpractical, but at least there's only one clear winning or drawing line. It does seem to me like Lichess selects for engine-like precision rather than practical applications of tactics. chess.com has far more, at least in the ~1600 tactics rating level.Many users prefer Lichess's UI and UX to Chess.com's. There are also philosophical differences between the two sites: Lichess is ad free and subsists on donations, while Chess.com is a profit-over-everything-else business. People don't typically like paywalls for features when free alternatives exist. Furthermore, there are cultural differences ...Puzzles. Chess.com puzzle training is a terrific resource to get up to speed on tactics. With a free membership, you get five puzzles per day. The Gold membership will get you 25 puzzles to solve per day. This is a lot, and I doubt anybody would average over 25 per day.Website Popularity. According to Alexa 90-day search rankings, chess.com ranks 303rd and lichess.org ranks 1080th in worldwide web traffic. This serves as an estimate of the overall popularity of the websites. Of the 386 players who have taken the ChessGoals survey, 360 (93%) play regularly on chess.com. 158 (41%) of survey respondents play ...Due to marketing and domain/brand name, chesscom is the natural first place to go for someone new to chess or someone who just saw some streamers etc. You don't hear about Lichess until you've gained a bit more experience. That said, that the average Lichess player is better doesn't matter - you're paired against players at your level on both ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Lichess vs. Chess.c*m Blitz rating distribution, proving that just by playing on Lichess, you are automatically a better player than chess.c*m usersSome people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. 1600-1800 Elo. Im 1900 on lichess and 1700 on chess.com. I think around 200-300 points are average.Hey r/Chess Community! My friend and I created a chrome extension that brings you actionable info and tendencies about your Lichess Opponents at game time (e.g., performance rating, game results, speed, and more). In broad strokes, it works behind the scenes to do the following:Chesstempo standard: 1500-1600 (5600+ tactics done) Lichess Puzzles: 2000-2100 (Lichess puzzles feel way easier to me, I could probably push my puzzle rating even higher if I properly tried) Lichess Blitz: 1200 : ( (I play a lot of tactics and very little actual chess lol) BrinyEmperor • 1850 rapid chess.com • 2 yr. ago.Best. lIlCitanul • 1 yr. ago. It's through a phone app. Chess.com has it build in. For lichess you need a seperate app from DGT. And they acknowledge it isn't great. On their website they state they are working on a new app. If you insist on playing on Lichess I would wait and see about this new app.This exactly. chess.com only runs its analysis to something like 3 moves deep to catch any one or two move blunders so you can quickly look over the game. Lichess runs the cloud analysis to depth 24, I believe, so it gets a much better picture of what the game looked like. keinespur • 2 yr. ago. [deleted] • 2 yr. ago.On Lichess, your rating starts at 1500 and your RD starts at 350. The rating system starts you out saying "This player is probably somewhere between 1150 and 1850." Each player also has a volatility, which basically gauges how often the player performs at the expected outcome. For example, if a 1200 player faces a 2000 player and wins, their ...On Lichess.org I hover around ~1350-1450 on Rapid 10+0 games, but on Chess.com I can't get past 1150. Are the rankings different? The level of players? Or because I've almost exclusively played on Lichess.org the past few years - I seldom play games in real life - that my brain isn't used to the board? Thanks!The stigma of lichess rating inflation comes from two things. The player pool used to be much weaker, so I would hit 1400 a few years ago, take a long break from chess, then come back stronger but loose points because the "average" player had gotten a bit strongerChesstempo are much more involved sit there and calculate for 5-10 minutes type puzzles (standard set). They're very high quality and each puzzle has a really good comment section where people discuss the critical lines. Chesstempo for calculation and visualisation. Lichess/chess.com for rapid fire pattern recognition.Even though cheating is widespread, most of the accusations, especially on the mid-level (1500-2100) tend to be completely unfounded: there are more accusations than cheaters. 1000 rating on chess.com is the equivalent to 1300 on lichess. It might be why you have the impression that people are much better or cheating on chess.com.I have achieved both 2300+ blitz ratings, on chess.com and lichess and I feel like achieving it on lichess feels more like I achieved 1000 rating or something ( "walk in the park") feels very easy , without much trying or stress, whether if I try to do the same on chess.com feels more like an endless torture back and forth.I like chess.com but their server is crap. Lichess has a better, cleaner more user friendly layout and I’ve never had any issues with their servers, so for this reason I use lichess. As far as the difference in numerical ranking goes: just pay attention to percentile, it gives you a better idea of where you’re at. On Lichess, your rating starts at 1500 and your RD starts at 350. The rating system starts you out saying "This player is probably somewhere between 1150 and 1850." Each player also has a volatility, which basically gauges how often the player performs at the expected outcome. For example, if a 1200 player faces a 2000 player and wins, their ...Not saying chess.com is hugely better necessarily, but defaulting the win to Lichess because of price is ridiculous. My take on the difference is: I like Lichess for the Study feature, and the opening explorer filtered certain rating ranges is very convenient (checking a couple quick lines is a lot smoother than battling with Chessbase).I'm 1900 FIDE and ~2180 lichess classical. Unless you're playing G60 or longer time controls on Lichess with a physical board and in uncomfortable chairs and bad lighting, you are talking about two different games. Yes, they're both chess, but you could say the same thing about 1 0 and correspondence.Comparing between communities is a bit dangerous. The best way to compare between groups is to look at the rating distribution, and then look at the group differences. For Lichess, the distribution looks like this. For chess.com, the graph looks like this. Note the modes are quite different: lichess around 1625 and chess.com around 1250.5. unwettermaschine • 8 mo. ago. lichess uses a different rating system. I‘m not aware of the specifics myself but the initial rating for a new account on lichess is 1500, whereas on chess.com it‘s 1200 (or at least it was when I played there a long time ago). So yeah, lichess ratings are always going to be a few hundred points higher ... Hey Op blitz and bullet have almost no correlation between rapid and classical in my opinion. From my experience Rapid chess.com is very similar to classical otb, I would say classical is 50-100pts lower than rapid and that's 15+10 not 10+0. So a 2000 rated rapid player would be about a 1900-1950 otb from chess.com.I'm wondering if there is a known relationship between ratings on chesstempo and lichess. In my case, I'm rated 1400 in chesstempo blitz tactics, and 1300 in lichess blitz. I believe both sites have ratings which are centered at 1500. In my case, does the higher rating on chesstempo likely mean that tactics are not my major weakness at the moment?For me, $100 a year is definitely worth it for the value I get from chess.com. I understand why people don’t like it, but it’s been by far the number 1 reason I’ve improved over the last 9 months. I think the new system is incredible and I’d pay $100 just for that feature.On Lichess, your rating starts at 1500 and your RD starts at 350. The rating system starts you out saying "This player is probably somewhere between 1150 and 1850." Each player also has a volatility, which basically gauges how often the player performs at the expected outcome. For example, if a 1200 player faces a 2000 player and wins, their ...This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.I like chess.com but their server is crap. Lichess has a better, cleaner more user friendly layout and I’ve never had any issues with their servers, so for this reason I use lichess. As far as the difference in numerical ranking goes: just pay attention to percentile, it gives you a better idea of where you’re at.The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more! The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed.r/chess • Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."GM Peter Svidler analyzes the epic endgame between Anand and Carlsen: "This is the most study like endgame I have seen in a proper game of chess in a long time. It is like fairytale stuff I am struggling to believe". 447. 32. r/chess.Chess.com premium gets you a LOT more than chess24. That being said, Lichess (or Chess.com free version) provides pretty much everything you would need to progress. The main benefit of chess.com premium imo is unlimited lessons, there are some great resources there, so if you do end up upgrading make sure to check out the lessons.Lichess vs chess com reddit, 2010 dodge charger fuse box diagram, www craigslist com venta de carros
Lichess is 1000 years ahead in technology. For Lichess, the pawns on b7 and g7 look like cute little mice, so I'm gonna have to go with Lichess. Lichess is better but Chess. com has copious amounts of cash. Obv. chess.c*m is better as lichess' arrows have little gaps as …. Lichess vs chess com reddit
hamilton streetChess Assist is lightweight and packed with all new features! Calculate the best move, get live score data, and adjust your engine rating all with on-screen visuals. Custom made and lightning fast, this extension carries full support for Lichess.org, ChessArena.com, and Immortal.game!lichess - actual infinite analysis made by free engine for free, actual premoves. chesscom - analysis are total trash that even 1800 elo moves are often missed because of 15 depth which is like 0,05 seconds of thinking (still by the same free engine btw, so you pay for using free engine analysis of your game, you can simply download it btw, so this is more or …Completely agree but in terms of what site to play on I go lichess. I previously played chess.con for most of my years of playing chess however I feel with the rising popularity of chess and the fact that new players will gravitate towards chess.com or lichess I think it is important to support the smaller site.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com vs Lichess: rating comparison . Is there a significant difference between same rating adversaries between the two platforms. ... It seems to me there is at the 1600-1700 range, but can be just guessing as I don't have a bunch of games in lichess. Related TopicsAs you get closer to 1500 it becomes 500 point difference a s the collapsing point is around 2300 lichess. Edit Chesscom. For FIDE take away another 200 is what I hear consistently. It's not perfect but this site has I think the most realistic comparison of …Lichess could use starting elo 10,000 if they wanted and again just end up with a different scale. Your argument is like saying FIDE ELO is inflated because nobody has ELO less than 100 and so the decimal point should be moved to make GM's ratings 24-28 and normal people would have ratings 1-20. 1.I use chess.com but have accounts on both. It's purely by habit though, since I started on chess.com I just keep going back. Lichess is probably the better site, the community on Chess.com is kinda mean, a lot of salty and trash talking people haha.At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ...Chesscom has two modes, review and analysis. Just ditch the review one and go for analysis - it will show you the engine lines. I recently created a chess.com burner account since I'd been tilting a lot on Lichess and didn't want to affect my rating anymore. Lichess recently introduced the option to hide all ratings. Might be helpful for you. Its not about player base but start rating. My lichess rating is about 400 higher than on chess.com but by percentile of players I'm quite a bit higher on chess.com. Even tough I play more and try harder on lichess. My ELO is 500-600 points lower than lichess rating.The Glicko rating system and Glicko-2 rating system are methods for assessing a player's strength in games of skill, such as chess and Go. It was invented by Mark Glickman as an improvement on the Elo rating system, and initially intended for the primary use as a chess rating system. Glickman's principal contribution to measurement is "ratings ...I mean it kinda does. Lower rated players spamming moves won't be too helpful for top players. And lower rated players giving low rated streamers move suggestions won't be as helpful in most cases since they may or may not play the move and very possibly don't see the idea if it's a good move they weren't going to play anyway.The engine will take you through your mistakes and blunders and you can try to correct them. Its a lot less intuitive and helpful than the coach feature on chess.com but its something. Lichess could be a lot better from a UI/UX perspective but im guessing they are operating with less than 5% of the resources chess.com has.The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, advertising links (including YouTube chess tutorial videos without context), and memes is not allowed.We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with.iamspookydooky • 6 mo. ago. chess.com is better for beginners because of its quick analysis / lessons and has better scheduled tournaments. lichess can offer similar analysis for free, albeit likely more cumbersome for a newbie. Services vs. free is the choice you're making. Both are excellent, many people use both. [deleted] • 6 mo. ago. On lichess.org, you can play unrated games ("casual") that don't affect your rating. That wouldn't be cheating. I've played against people in the same physical room as me on chess.com several times without issues. If you have a tablet, consider getting one of the many chess programs available and play on that.Lichess tries to set its average rating to 1500; chess.com generally sets its to 800. However, Lichess generally has a stronger pool of players, so the rating difference works out to typically be about 400, not 700. If I had one Elo point for every time this question gets asked, engines would never stand a chance.whiteknight1968. Mar 12, 2023. 0. #241. "That's actually crazy since the average 1500 on chess.com is rated around 1850 in Rapid on Lichess." "Rapid" on Lichess is anything slower than blitz and less than 30/0; "Rapid" here includes 30/0 and even 60/0. Which is dumb.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ...View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess accounts between two "1500s"(one of which is 2700 bullet and blitz) follow Ding-Nepo game 8 exactly. They were ... There are countless chess sites and programs Lichess is just a good one but unusable since you don't want to put your prep on the internet.Many people prefer lichess due to the variety of options it offers, and also because it's open source and ad-free. Chess.com got a big advantage by claiming the website name early. I personally use chess.com, I'm just used to it and I think it looks cleaner. If you just wanna play chess, it pretty much doesn't matter, but for good options ...Old Lichess was harder I think, my rating in new Lichess is higher than old Lichess (now ~2000). Haven't used chesstempo so I can't comment. Despite my complaining I still appreciate Lichess because it's free. Puzzles in lichess now with the new version are very very very good at all levels.The amount of people that say, "this one is better, this one is worse". Like shut up. Doesn't matter if you play on one of those crappy unity chess games on Google play. Your still playing, and that is the point. Yes, I know chessdotcom is having some issues with servers. But that doesn't make it bad. Nor does it make lichess better then it.I have achieved both 2300+ blitz ratings, on chess.com and lichess and I feel like achieving it on lichess feels more like I achieved 1000 rating or something ( "walk in the park") feels very easy , without much trying or stress, whether if I try to do the same on chess.com feels more like an endless torture back and forth.I understand Lichess is Reddit's favorite. But for those with memberships to Chess.com, the site has completely revamped their Chess Lessons. ... ATM there's 90k users online at chess.com and only 35k at lichess. Chess.com probably has more "casuals" than Lichess's entire userbase including the likes of Magnus Carlsen. ReplyIs lichess overall accuracy worse than chess.com? So a while back I used the game review feature on chess.com and it gave me an average accuracy of around 80 something while lichess gave me an accuracy of over 93. Just now I used the lichess analysis and it gave me an average score of 95 when I made 2 inaccuracies.Lichess is very well designed in general, which is nice. Chess.com can be very clunky to navigate. Chess.com has vastly better puzzle features. The puzzles are …I'm wondering if there is a known relationship between ratings on chesstempo and lichess. In my case, I'm rated 1400 in chesstempo blitz tactics, and 1300 in lichess blitz. I believe both sites have ratings which are centered at 1500. In my case, does the higher rating on chesstempo likely mean that tactics are not my major weakness at the moment?Basically, lichess = chess.com + 300 = uscf = fide + 100. Noticed this as wel , rating 1000 on chess.com is about the same as rating 1400 on lichess. I discussed this a bit in this post. However if we are talking about what each site offers for free, lichess is miles better and it isn't even close.Played chess for 2.5 years and I've never seen anything like this...a literal zombie cheater account that can ignore chess.com's account closure and continue to play rated games. r/chessbeginners • Pretty effective tactic to play with the London that has gotten me mate three times in the last five games I have playedMy puzzle rating is around 1600. Rapid 1100, bullet 1000 and today passed 1000 in blitz for the first time! I'm pretty much the exact same as you haha. Hi pretty much the exact same as you haha, I'm dad. Nice! I don't have a rapid or bullet rating as I've played less than 4 rated games in each and it was awhile ago.Chess.com tactics are a bit inpractical, but at least there's only one clear winning or drawing line. It does seem to me like Lichess selects for engine-like precision rather than practical applications of tactics. chess.com has far more, at least in the ~1600 tactics rating level.Why lichess is better than chess.com: rating system glicko 2 vs glicko 1. In Lichess there are a lot less rating distortions as there are in chess.com . better interface. Better app. anti-lag. In Lichess, they focus on giving a fair experience to the players, so they have implemented the anti-lag system, which divides the lag among the players.Best. ishouldbeatuni • • 3 yr. ago. The Silman strategy lessons are very good, they might be on the difficult side but offer a ton of really useful insights on how to approach slow-ish positions. It's a very similar experience to reading any one of his chess books (which I also recommend). 17.chess.com elo vs lichess elo. There’s a solid gap between the two sites, but that’s waaaay too big of gap. Something is definitely off. I’m 1700 blitz chesscom, and 1800ish Lichess. 1815 rapid chesscom, and currently 1850 Lichess, but I don’t really play too much rapid on Lichess, so not sure if that’s where I actually belong.This is really cool haha. I found out that this 1250 guy I indirectly beat figured out a top secret "push pawns and then shuffle pieces in your base until opponent runs out of time" strategy in 1/4+0 ultrabullet that pumped him up 500 elo over the course of a single month (!) and let him take a game off an 2400-ultrabullet IM who beat Carlsen later in 1+0 bullet lolLichess vs chess.com. Miscellaneous. Close. Vote. Posted by 5 minutes ago. Lichess vs chess.com. Miscellaneous. Is there a difference between ratings on these websites? ... The home of chess on Reddit. 405k. Members. 1.9k. Online. Created Apr 5, 2008. Join. help Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts.Really sucks losing 20 points on a tactic after solving 5 for 4 points each but i like that they're untimed. Lichess tactics are quite simple I have found. I've been playing chess for 2 months and I'm 2075 rating. I would think my chess rating was 1000-1200.In my experience with enough practice you can learn to predict certain types of mistakes in a player which is a skill you can learn from playing the engine. Also as a final note, the ratings on those "bots" on chess.com are so clearly inflated to boost people's egos. So many sub 900s posting they "beat the 1500 bot".Lichess is just a better layout and chess.com seems to have more cheaters on it. Chess.com also wants money for legit everything including tactics, and chess.com is more American than worldy. Lichess has the anonymous option for when you want a quick consequence less challenge, and you end up playing people all over the planet. In my experience with enough practice you can learn to predict certain types of mistakes in a player which is a skill you can learn from playing the engine. Also as a final note, the ratings on those "bots" on chess.com are so clearly inflated to boost people's egos. So many sub 900s posting they "beat the 1500 bot".nyubet •. Lichess has for free everything that chess.com offers for the most expensive membership. Being a Lichess patreon ("premium" equivalent, but not really) does not offer any other services, everything will be the exact same, the only difference being that you are making an optional donation which allows the site to keep working for ...Yes. I believe 100-200 points higher than USCF, at least 200 higher than chess.com last I played at chess.com (yes, I do think chess.com ratings are actually a bit lower than USCF for blitz anyway). CatalystoftheMind • 7 yr. ago. My lichess rating has always been significantly higher than my chess.com rating.Chess.com and lichess use different rating systems, and give different ratings to new players. Chess.com ratings end up being consistently lower, but that doesn't correspond to you being in a lower percentile of players on chess.com (what parent was talking about). For reference though, I'm 2000 lichess rapid, and 1700 chess.com rapid.This. Lichess has written an explanation of the different rating systems. Here is someone trying explore which rating in one system is equivalent to a rating in another (so chess.com vs lichess, chess.com vs FIDE, etc).. On average I would guess Lichess has a slightly stronger pool of players, but that is because chess.com is most likely the first site beginners find.iamspookydooky • 6 mo. ago. chess.com is better for beginners because of its quick analysis / lessons and has better scheduled tournaments. lichess can offer similar analysis for free, albeit likely more cumbersome for a newbie. Services vs. free is the choice you're making. Both are excellent, many people use both. [deleted] • 6 mo. ago. Is lichess overall accuracy worse than chess.com? So a while back I used the game review feature on chess.com and it gave me an average accuracy of around 80 something while lichess gave me an accuracy of over 93. Just now I used the lichess analysis and it gave me an average score of 95 when I made 2 inaccuracies.The puzzles aren't harder on lichess but the puzzle elo on lichess is more realistic. You'll get equivalent hard puzzles on chess.com but your rating appears to be higher. Yes, though I also enjoy the conceptual/composed puzzles on chesscom. In a funny way they compliment each other. The most difficult are on chesstempo.Which is the best site for playing chess out of chess.com and lichess? Is chess24 and chess.com premium worth its buck? Find out in this short video giving y...950 blitz on chess.com compares closely to about 1300 lichess blitz and 1550 rapid. So your rapid is right at the average, blitz is a bit higher on lichess. The standard deviation for the lichess blitz comparison is +/- 130 points which means 68% of 950-rated chess.com blitz players fall between 1170 and 1430 blitz.Lichess looks for people that have played in the last week, afaik chess.com looks for people that have played 20 games in the last 90 days. I have argued in the past that lichess' selection skews towards stronger players and I still feel that way, but this is a massive difference we have to account for.Hi everyone. I've been playing against the computer for years using chess.com, but have started to try lichess given the overwhelming popularity on this sub. I find it infuriating. Please help. I love the mobile board on chess.com, because I can easily hop into analysis to criticize what tactics I'm not seeing. Is this feature available on lichess? I previously played chess.con for most of my years of playing chess however I feel with the rising popularity of chess and the fact that new players will gravitate towards chess.com or lichess I think it is important to support the smaller site. Chess.com has enough money whereas lichess runs on donationsBoth sites are equally good, given some non-free extra-features for Chesscom. I play Chesscom and Lichess everyday. In the end I'm able to play competitive chess on both, with a fair enough elo system and a quick matchmaking, so I guess they both complete the original mission of a chess application.It seems Chess Ultra is the general consensus, and at $10 (currently on sale for like $6.50, it matches my budget considering I usually play this for free... I had a couple recommendations for Clubhouse Games: 51 World Classics as well, however, that is a $40 game and I would only be interested in like, 2 or 3 o those 51 classics.You can't really use rating comparisons as a measurement for one site having harder opponents than the other. As they both use different rating system and those differences is why you have a higher elo on lichess than on chess.com. Instead I tend to look more at my percentile, being 2100 on lichess means im "better than 95.6%" of players where as on chess.com 2000 elo had me above 99% lol.Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ... White to play: chess.com | lichess.org Black to play : chess.com | lichess.org I'm a computer vision / machine learning bot written by u/pkacprzak | I'm also the first chess eBook Reader: ebook.chessvision.ai | download me as Chrome extension or Firefox add-on and analyze positions from any image/video in a browser | website chessvision.aiLichess Puzzles vs Chess.com puzzles. I am rated approx. 1800 for both sites in puzzle elo. I hear people say that lichess elo is more inflated than chess.com, thus chess.com puzzles should be harder than lichess? But I find chess.com puzzles a lot more easier than lichess, is there a reason, or does this inflation not count for puzzle elo? Vote.Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. 1600-1800 Elo. Im 1900 on lichess and 1700 on chess.com. I think around 200-300 points are average.The puzzle difficulty seems to increase too slow though. Probably still needs some tweaking. That was intentional. Around 50% of Lichess userbase is rated under 1500, and it's not much fun when you can't get past a score of 10. Puzzle Storm is a feature for everybody on Lichess, and not only for high rated players.You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ... . Ole miss 247 board, sipnsave circle k